Scan barcode
nguyen_vy's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
aperoki's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
reflective
sad
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
After halfway it rushes to the conclusion and even more quickly to the aftermath, but I guess the book isn't really about Erekosë. I think it's about the terrible weight that fate exerts, and what it can cost to defy it.
being_b's review against another edition
2.0
Well that was tedious. Wanky dude with identity issues is pulled into Generic Fantasy World #12 and makes decisions as required by the plot.
patarche's review against another edition
dark
reflective
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
scheu's review against another edition
4.0
An introduction of sorts to the Eternal Champion concept that populates most of Moorcock's fiction. I could do without the second of the three books in this volume. I skipped it. I'm not ashamed to admit it. It was pretty terrible. The other two (especially the first) were so much better.
klopnis's review
adventurous
dark
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Content Warnings
Moderate: Genocide
Minor: Rape
erlantz's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
sad
medium-paced
5.0
thomas_hense's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
relaxing
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
My favourite Moorcock book so far. Some of it made no logical sense, but it was a fun and light read.
isauldur's review against another edition
3.0
[b:The Eternal Champion|1826082|The Eternal Champion (Erekosë, #1)|Michael Moorcock|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1265763162s/1826082.jpg|44842200]: 3 or 3.5 stars. It's pretty predictable and a little rushed sometimes, but it's fun and has some epic sequences. It doesn't quite reach the heights of Elric or even Corum.
[b:Phoenix in Obsidian|757297|Phoenix in Obsidian (Erekosë, #2)|Michael Moorcock|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1308390810s/757297.jpg|1825827]: 3 stars but barely. It's dark and has a lot more atmosphere than the previous novel, but it's a little disjointed and all over the place. The revelations about the Eternal Champion and the Multiverse are certainly helpful for later, if one plans to continue reading Moorcock's multiverse series, but overall it's dark, depressing and falls a little flat.
[b:The Dragon in the Sword|757283|The Dragon in the Sword (Erekosë, #3)|Michael Moorcock|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1299425551s/757283.jpg|743397]: 3 maybe 3.5 stars. More cohesive than its predecessor, but not quite as straightforward as the first novel in the trilogy. It's fun most of the time, and it offers a lot of cool looks at the core of the Balance and the struggle between Law and Chaos. Sometimes it drags, but the pacing is better than that of the previous two. I found von Bek unnecessary in this, and I felt like Moorcock just wanted to excuse his presence near the end where von Bek does something "important." Still, I enjoyed it.
Overall, if I were to rate this omnibus as a single novel, I'd probably go as high as 3.5 stars, but wouldn't round up. It's fun, sets up the multiverse, but I'd recommend starting reading Moorcock's series elsewhere. Maybe the first three Elric books, or the first Corum trilogy.
[b:Phoenix in Obsidian|757297|Phoenix in Obsidian (Erekosë, #2)|Michael Moorcock|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1308390810s/757297.jpg|1825827]: 3 stars but barely. It's dark and has a lot more atmosphere than the previous novel, but it's a little disjointed and all over the place. The revelations about the Eternal Champion and the Multiverse are certainly helpful for later, if one plans to continue reading Moorcock's multiverse series, but overall it's dark, depressing and falls a little flat.
[b:The Dragon in the Sword|757283|The Dragon in the Sword (Erekosë, #3)|Michael Moorcock|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1299425551s/757283.jpg|743397]: 3 maybe 3.5 stars. More cohesive than its predecessor, but not quite as straightforward as the first novel in the trilogy. It's fun most of the time, and it offers a lot of cool looks at the core of the Balance and the struggle between Law and Chaos. Sometimes it drags, but the pacing is better than that of the previous two. I found von Bek unnecessary in this, and I felt like Moorcock just wanted to excuse his presence near the end where von Bek does something "important." Still, I enjoyed it.
Overall, if I were to rate this omnibus as a single novel, I'd probably go as high as 3.5 stars, but wouldn't round up. It's fun, sets up the multiverse, but I'd recommend starting reading Moorcock's series elsewhere. Maybe the first three Elric books, or the first Corum trilogy.
the_evergrowing_library's review against another edition
4.0
1970’s science fantasy, it’s a wonderful thing. Authors didn’t weigh themselves down with masses of world building and it felt like you learned along with them. This also made them less of a daunting word count for when you just wanted a trip to another world.
I found the story flowed well and while it does have a slightly clunky start, it still had decent pacing throughout. The character of Erekosë does fall into the role a little too easily and it would have been good to get a little more from the acclimatisation.
Once the story gets going though it’s a wonderful journey and Erekosë/John really starts to think for himself after the tides of war are upon him. This is really when the story opens up and takes shape truly and it starts to add the layers needed for a wonderful read.
I got through this fast and no, it’s not a masterpiece, but for its time it’s great and I could fully imagine someone paging through this in 1970 and just being blown away.
I found the story flowed well and while it does have a slightly clunky start, it still had decent pacing throughout. The character of Erekosë does fall into the role a little too easily and it would have been good to get a little more from the acclimatisation.
Once the story gets going though it’s a wonderful journey and Erekosë/John really starts to think for himself after the tides of war are upon him. This is really when the story opens up and takes shape truly and it starts to add the layers needed for a wonderful read.
I got through this fast and no, it’s not a masterpiece, but for its time it’s great and I could fully imagine someone paging through this in 1970 and just being blown away.