Scan barcode
unaturalnat's review against another edition
adventurous
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
westwoodfrog's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.5
1.5 pcq j'ai eu 16 grâce au livre mais pire livre de l'année vas-y
annacttn's review against another edition
Batshit and Brown could NOT write LOL. How can a book that contains a spontaneous human combustion in the first 10 pages not capitalize on that. Entertaining, though, in an extremely manic way.
hthacher's review against another edition
challenging
dark
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
connell98's review against another edition
3.0
Interesting in one of the most basic ways, this book really only appeals in the sense of basic mystery that is already explained in the introduction. I know that most academically produced books do so, but it doesn't help that the book is already kind of boring and repetitive. I read this for a graduate-level course.
In all honesty, the "Memoirs of Carwin the Biloquist" was the most interesting part, and it is unfinished!
In all honesty, the "Memoirs of Carwin the Biloquist" was the most interesting part, and it is unfinished!
jackieeejw's review against another edition
Feel bad that I never finished this because I really enjoyed it! But I just didn't have time, college is a whir.
elisekath's review against another edition
challenging
dark
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
the8th's review against another edition
4.0
I really, really enjoyed this novel. I'll write more about it sometime.
samara_surface's review against another edition
3.0
Title: Wieland: or, The Transformation: An American Tale
Author: Charles Brockden Brown
Published: 1798
Year I read it: 2009, 2011
One sentence summary: An epistolary, gothic, Colonial-American novel, this is the tragic story penned by Clara Wieland, detailing her father and, later, brother's descent into religious fanaticism and of the voices they hear - voices from the divine, from madness, or from the strange, visiting Carwin?
Interesting fact: Considered by many to be the first significant novel to be written and published in America. Brown was the most successful American author until James Fenimore Cooper.
Three reasons to read it:
If you like mysteries or the gothic, you'd find this really interesting. Unlike many late 18th English or American novels, this novel leaves several plot points open-ended. [If you read it, or have read it, DO leave your spoilerific theories in the comments below]
Originally, Wieland was written more as a philosophical novel - to explore psychology, community-formation, and even as a commentary of the (then) newly constitutionalized America. When I first came to it, it really surprised me that one of the original American novels was a philosophical "horror," but the more we studied it, the more it made sense.
I am not much one for epistolary novels (unfortunately, a majority of 18th C novels are epistolary), but the way Brown handled it, I wasn't so bothered by the epistolary form. I actually found Clara Wieland to be a very strong, if unreliable, narrator.
One reason you maybe shouldn't:
I will admit to this being a bizarre story. If you are familiar with the gothic, it makes a bit more sense, but, I mean, a character dies from spontaneous combustion [to be fair - Dickens used this to explain a character's death over 50 years later]. It is a strange plot, but having read it now twice, I appreciate it's eccentricities.
Great quotes:
My narrative may be invaded by inaccuracy and confusion; but if I live no longer, I will, at least, live to complete it. What but ambiguities, abruptnesses, and dark transitions, can be expected from the historian who is, at the same time, the sufferer of these disasters?
Presently, I considered, that whether Wieland was a maniac, a faithful servant of his God, the victim of hellish illusions, or the dupe of human imposture, was by no means certain.
Part of my series "31 Days of Books" over at Wait and Hope
Author: Charles Brockden Brown
Published: 1798
Year I read it: 2009, 2011
One sentence summary: An epistolary, gothic, Colonial-American novel, this is the tragic story penned by Clara Wieland, detailing her father and, later, brother's descent into religious fanaticism and of the voices they hear - voices from the divine, from madness, or from the strange, visiting Carwin?
Interesting fact: Considered by many to be the first significant novel to be written and published in America. Brown was the most successful American author until James Fenimore Cooper.
Three reasons to read it:
If you like mysteries or the gothic, you'd find this really interesting. Unlike many late 18th English or American novels, this novel leaves several plot points open-ended. [If you read it, or have read it, DO leave your spoilerific theories in the comments below]
Originally, Wieland was written more as a philosophical novel - to explore psychology, community-formation, and even as a commentary of the (then) newly constitutionalized America. When I first came to it, it really surprised me that one of the original American novels was a philosophical "horror," but the more we studied it, the more it made sense.
I am not much one for epistolary novels (unfortunately, a majority of 18th C novels are epistolary), but the way Brown handled it, I wasn't so bothered by the epistolary form. I actually found Clara Wieland to be a very strong, if unreliable, narrator.
One reason you maybe shouldn't:
I will admit to this being a bizarre story. If you are familiar with the gothic, it makes a bit more sense, but, I mean, a character dies from spontaneous combustion [to be fair - Dickens used this to explain a character's death over 50 years later]. It is a strange plot, but having read it now twice, I appreciate it's eccentricities.
Great quotes:
My narrative may be invaded by inaccuracy and confusion; but if I live no longer, I will, at least, live to complete it. What but ambiguities, abruptnesses, and dark transitions, can be expected from the historian who is, at the same time, the sufferer of these disasters?
Presently, I considered, that whether Wieland was a maniac, a faithful servant of his God, the victim of hellish illusions, or the dupe of human imposture, was by no means certain.
Part of my series "31 Days of Books" over at Wait and Hope