clarabooksit's review against another edition

Go to review page

Not what I expected. While the cases are interesting, the writing is too clinical and esoteric for me, and I thought there would be more exploration of diagnoses and trying to help the patients but it’s really just “here’s another oddity.”

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

pinkpanther's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective slow-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kat_smith24's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful informative reflective slow-paced

3.5

Though the language is outdated and paternalistic, this book offers a surprisingly nuanced approach to (at the time) rarer neurological disorders.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lovelymisanthrope's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful informative reflective medium-paced

5.0

I received this as a gift after stumbling across the title while working at a university bookstore. I thought the content sounded fascinating.
"The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat" is a collection of different case studies from renowned neuroscientist Oliver Sacks. Each chapter chronicles a different patient suffering with a different type of memory-related issue.
I really enjoyed how this book was organized and presented. There were sections that grouped related cases together, and there was an introduction for each section to give a high-level overview of what was going to be discussed. Each case and patient were discussed thoughtfully; however, it is quickly evident that this book was written many years ago because some of the terminology used felt insensitive. The mind is a wild and fascinating place, and I think it is riveting to learn about different instances of medical anomalies.
If you are interested in or studying the mind, I recommend this work, and I will certainly keep Oliver Sacks's work in mind to pick up in the future. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

amyodell's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ominousevent's review against another edition

Go to review page

It was interesting to learn a bit about things that can happen to brains, but I really don’t like the way Sacks talks about his patients (as if they are specimens, in many cases not really fully human), and some of his theories seem to be supported by nothing more than his affection for his own ideas. Not recommended. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

space_funk's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional informative slow-paced

1.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

eve81's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective medium-paced

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

a_hutchinson19's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective medium-paced

3.75

I found this really interesting. It was heavy but I also got through it very quickly. Trigger warnings for derogatory terms for disability and me tap heath due to the age of this book.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

carysisamelt's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective sad slow-paced

3.5

an extremely interesting book, even in the 21st century. however, there is a lot of things that made me uncomfortable when reading this, namely the use of the r-slur (though used as an actually medical term, someone should definitely revise this) and the complete inaccuracy when describing autism. i really liked the start but ending with the chapter “simpletons” (or name to that effect) left a sour taste in my mouth. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings