eve81's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective medium-paced

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

a_hutchinson19's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective medium-paced

3.75

I found this really interesting. It was heavy but I also got through it very quickly. Trigger warnings for derogatory terms for disability and me tap heath due to the age of this book.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

carysisamelt's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective sad slow-paced

3.5

an extremely interesting book, even in the 21st century. however, there is a lot of things that made me uncomfortable when reading this, namely the use of the r-slur (though used as an actually medical term, someone should definitely revise this) and the complete inaccuracy when describing autism. i really liked the start but ending with the chapter “simpletons” (or name to that effect) left a sour taste in my mouth. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sunn_bleach's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging hopeful informative medium-paced

3.0

Interesting but in a way I didn’t expect. This is very much a neurology book written in the early 80s, with all the language and paradigms that implies. The dead-serious use of the word “retarded” and unironic appeals to Freud and Luria are kind of shocking for 40+ years later. But I’m kind of struck at how much Sacks so obviously cared for his patients as people, not just case studies. That kind of narrative is important for humanizing the humans we treat.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

gotothecorner's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark hopeful reflective slow-paced

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

angelfireeast24's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

apxfudge's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

grex_ronnie's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional informative reflective slow-paced

3.5

Primo libro dell’anno. Divorato in questi giorni di quarantena ho trovato la scrittura di Sacks estremamente interessante. A volte alcuni termini usati sono molto tecnici ma sono dovuti anche alla natura del libro, così come anche la “ripetività” di alcuni articoli.
Un ottimo libro, comunque per iniziare quest’anno.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ellieintherye's review

Go to review page

 Ok, I'm finally abandoning this after almost a year of avoiding it. It's possible I'll pick it up again to lull me to sleep when I've got nothing else on my bedside table. But, I don't see that happening. For the most part this felt equal parts boring, unimportant, and bordering on exploitative? There's almost zero cultural or social context, which is one of the main reasons I read nonfiction in the first place. The style makes it feel like field notes for a fellow neurologist, but just subjective enough to be uncomfortable. 



Not a fan. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

imoran's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny hopeful informative

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings