Reviews tagging 'Transphobia'

Meddling Kids by Edgar Cantero, Sara Segovia Esteban

39 reviews

pageglue's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny mysterious sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

Uggghh so much potential! A great premise ruined by this piece of shit author.

Meddling Kids is basically an adult horror Scooby Doo novel, featuring the kinds of shenanigans that the gang got up to. The only praise I’ll give is that the plot was very gripping, enough to take me to end of this 450 page book, but even that was spoilt by its stupid ending.

While the writing was often cinematic, it also drew a lot of attention to itself, for instance ‘the wheezer (a monster) didn’t even make it until the end of this paragraph.” There were also these random switches to giving the dialogue in the form of a screenplay, including directions for the actors in parenthesis, which was just so weird.

There’s so much offensive shit in this book too. At first I thought it was emulating the vernacular of the 90s, and it felt unnecessary but not out of place. But there’s some rough intersexphobia and transphobia as well that basically casts two characters as crazy/evil freaks. 

Don’t read this awful book.

INSTEAD, read The Lamb Will Slaughter the Lion, and it’s sequel, The Barrow Will Send What it May by Margaret Killjoy. A gang of queer, anarchist punks solve supernatural mysteries. It’s a great time with some very cool characters. The biggest issue is that they’re both novellas, and I so wanted more! 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

devinmichayla's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sierrafroggy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

ngl found this super boring and really hard to read. the transphobic comments in the beginning were super unnecessary and made me real uncomfortable 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

buttermellow's review against another edition

Go to review page

tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No

1.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

emily_journals's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

The concept of this book really intrigued me. Scooby-Doo with Lovecraftian elements where the monsters might be (and likely are) real? Sign me up!

Except this book was so disappointing in execution. From reading other reviews, I'm so glad I read the audiobook version of this, because the stage direction inserts and made up words weren't as noticeable, so I'll give the narrator mad props for making those things really unnoticeable. I thought the book started off on the right track, but around the halfway point in this book is when I really started noticing all the negatives. 

First off, for being set in the 90s (and flashback-esque scenes from the 70s), I personally did not feel much nostalgia around any certain time period. This book could have mostly been reset from the 90s and plopped into modern day (or really, any other time period) with very little change; this is 100% fine, except one of the selling points promised by this book is to be nostalgic for the 90s specifically (which I personally did not find it to be). 

Secondly, the ending of this book. Everything that happened in the last ~20% of the book was chaotic, unbelievable, and hard to follow.
People were dying and being resurrected left and right, dogs were getting possessed by demons/angels/random protector beings(still unclear), rituals were being cast, people were living forever; it was all just too much going on and gives the feeling that the author had a bunch of ideas in the draft and didn't edit anything out.

Seriously, so much of the end of this book was just fight scene after fight scene, with little substantial buffer between, which I personally find really boring to read (or listen to) for a significant amount of time, especially when every fight scene is "gang fights creatures, then run, then fight new hoard of same creatures, then run.... repeat". 

Lastly, this book has some dangerous discussion of mental health and some questionable representation of queer people. The mental health discussion in this book is unnuanced and the whole introduction scene to the asylum has some problematic descriptions of people with and without mental health issues. The main villain ended up using transness as a device to live forever and be evil, which was super unnecessary. The lesbian character in this book is also very much a caricature of a "typical lesbian" media portrayal. 

Overall, I wish I had done more research into this book before picking it up instead of taking the promises given by the author/publisher at face value. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

gbrl's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

e_flah's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

Meddling Kids was a mixed experience -- the nostalgic Scooby Doo vibes were great and there were lots of truly bonkers shenanigans that felt true to the source material. On the other hand, the writing style was experimental in a way that I often found a bit frustrating. Meddling Kids is a book where the prose is basically a character itself as it demands to be acknowledged, rather than fading into the background to let the story take center stage. There's nothing wrong with this approach. I just personally didn't care for it and found it at odds with the tone of the plot.

Kerri and Andy were the reason I stuck with Meddling Kids. They were three-dimensional characters that reminded me of characters from the Scooby gang without feeling like cheap reproductions of them. Andy in particular won me over from the beginning. She's the fighter of the group who's also perfectly willing to be honest about when she's afraid.

If you really love Scooby Doo and like books that feel unlike anything else you've read, Meddling Kids may be the book for you.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

courtneyfalling's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

Oh boy! This book! Okay. So I listened to the first ~half on audiobook while driving, and it made the slowed down, reflective road trip scenes really resonate. I'm fascinated with how this book reimagined the Scooby Doo gang and used that premise to explore deeper issues of trauma, memory, economic depression and town-level politics, and supernatural horror while still having genuine relationships and banter between the characters. (There's some really good one-liners and similes strewn in.) But even while listening... I felt like a lot of my final take on this book would depend on how it concluded its main mystery. Early on, we get somewhat intrusive comments about Andy's butch lesbian aesthetic, speculating that she may be a young trans man, and these comments sit very differently with this book's actual end than if they had set up a larger exploration of gender and identity for Andy (which I'll get to unpacking more). There's also one really nasty scene early on where (cw: sexual assault)
Carrie dreams that Andy is sexually assaulting her while they're sleeping in Carrie's apartment together, then wakes to realize it was a horrid nightmare. I was thinking of my one friend's argument that vivid sexual assault scenes are never necessary in books, and this really swayed me toward that side. It had no real bearing on the plot and it was awful and jarring


Then... Nate. Look. This book doesn't sugarcoat that psychiatric institutions are just incarceration, but rather than just letting that critique exist as part of the book, the author keeps going out of his way to have the characters make saneist and ableist jokes about Nate and the folks he knew in psychiatric institutions. It's like the critique becomes that these places are prisons because of the foul and disruptive strangeness of the people inside... rather than actually thinking about trauma and social factors like the narrative easily could've done! 

Now for that frickin' ending.
Other reviewers have also noted this, but to center this book around a *gasp* evil trans woman reveal and use that to contrast the characters' own trauma arcs, especially to contrast Andy as a butch lesbian who's been speculatively labeled trans the entire book, is transphobic and shitty as hell. And even the lesbian representation is sketchy at best. Andy comes off as creepy, exploitative, and harassing toward Carrie, and it makes no sense for them to end up even loosely in the romantic relationship that's alluded to. Also, why did the last page pack in such a weird character reveal for Tim? Not only was it wildly out of left field, like a bad attempt to last minute deal with what the author realized was a slight plot hole, it was also, you guessed it, bad representation, this time of Indigenous folks and folklore in the Pacific Northwest! This book definitely buys into appropriating and misusing Indigenous folklore for its own benefit. Ugh. I wish this book didn’t have so many issues... the concept is genuinely cool then it just took every opportunity possible to fuck it up.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

fakepumpkins's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

siob___'s review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings