Scan barcode
kemrick19's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, and Death
Minor: Sexism and Sexual content
fallen_angel1002's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
This book is an embodiment of the sci-fi genre, covering a lot of the tropes of the genre, such as technological advancements, space travel, a dying earth after human intervention, and cyborgs and hunters. It is a fast-paced marvel that jumps around between characters that eventually come to spin one large web between themselves that connects their individual stories together.
Moderate: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Chronic illness, Death, Drug use, Gun violence, Blood, Medical content, Stalking, Gaslighting, Injury/Injury detail, and Pandemic/Epidemic
autonomous_lass's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Death, Gun violence, Violence, and Xenophobia
Minor: Infidelity
kergo's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.75
There are 2 Perspectives - one of a Bounty Hunter that is hunting Androids and one of a delivery driver for a synthetic animal clinic - which is categorized as a "special" person because he is infertile and therefore not deemed human and also he has low intellectual abilities.
And thats already where the problems arise.
I think the main subjects in this book want to be the philosophical question about what empathy entails and how this affects every one of us. The book is seeped through with classism, religious propaganda of a made up religion, and ableism but I am not sure if the book is trying to point out that the ableism in that world is something unjust, but as there is no resolution to the theme I will think of it as a weird form of ableistic representation of someone disabled.
The "special" people are almost excluded from every form of life and live in ruins in this distopic world. The person we follow missed the intelligence test just barely, which would've enabled him to at least partake in certain aspects of the communal life of those who stayed behind on the destroyed remains of earth. He was lucky enough to score a job where he could drive, something not everyone labled like he is is able to do. Through the book we learn of many moments of exklusion for him and he makes friends with the antagonists of the book - which lead to an disappointing ending of that arc but more of that later. The only thing he can partake of is the religion of the world, where people can connect thorugh an "empathaor" with the religious figure of Wilbur Mercer, a person who is reincarnated again and again and walks a path of struggle, combined with all the other people that are connecting through those devices at the same time. Thats the only sense of community that person percieves and that is also one the androids are prohibited from.
The hunted Androids are basically personal slaves that have fled from being used like that and only seek freedom and not being opressed anymore. In the book it is revealed that they only have a life span of about 4 years and still they are considered rogue and dangerous to all society. The ones we encounter in the book are a group of 8 friends which fled the colony of mars together, some seeking shelter, some to finally express their own personalities. At the beginning of the story 2 of them were already hunted down and the other six are on the hitlist of a higher ranked bounty hunter which was incapacitated by the third target, so our main protagonist takes that list over.
This character feels like the clicheed film noir PI, doused in his own scandals (he has an electric pet although society wants everyone to keep an alive animal to shelter them, scandalous) and a marriage that is kinda in shambles. He does nothing to mend that relationship, instead they bought a device that sets their moods to certain values and after a fight he put the value of his spouse to "appreciate the husband" or something like that. really scummy and weird (but thank god she changed that value (but why to depression)). We follow this twisted person, his only drive being owning a real pet and gathering the money for it what he will only achieve by "disabling" lots of androids. In the beginning he deemed that possibility impossible because his superiour must be down for that and lucky enough 10 pages later he is! what great suprise! After a while of the story he realises that he feels empathy for the androids, which does not hinder him from doing his job. Another bounty hunter tells him he should enter sexual relations with one of them and then shoot them, which he later kind of does, still not respecting their partner or any social code he has. The conflicting topic for him still is his drive to get an animal and how to do his job with his newfound empathy for androids (but he does the job for ages mind you!) and all other aspects of life seem kinda empty regarding him.
None of the issues of the book are really resolved apart from the main storyline and
If you read the whole thing as an adventure it was a pretty lame one, with a few physical struggles but no real dilemma or something that drives him apart from the resolution - his empathy for androids was always more an afterthought or a suspicion than a consequence, he says repeatedly that he cannot kill anymore, only for him not hesitate at all. He wants to quit but he only takes one day off.
He is not a charakter to be liked, not one to be inspired from, and noone who really impacts the reader.
The main themes of classism, (minor) effects of colonialism, ableism and the results of the war were the main driving force for me to wanting to read more of the book - I thought about certain scenes of the second movie, some of the first movie, which had more satisfying moments to be honest and I was really thinking about that worldbuilding.
I would be intrigued how the lifes of upstanding people in that world could function, the whole society is pushing people of "worth" (their words not mine) to go to colonies and if you arrive there you get your own personal android! how convinient! The main entertainment of that world is done by another android which is advocating against the main religion and those themes, the world shining through, were so enriching and nicely done that i overall found the book quite okay. It didnt blow me away, It didnt change my view of things, the main discussion of people talking about the story - if the bounty hunter is an android or not did not seem feasible to me and was not that interesting of a topic honestly.
Going to read another book of Dick's in the future, maybe I didnt understand his style of story quite yet, but i hope he can immerse me more and suprise me with a compelling tale.
Graphic: Ableism, Addiction, Animal death, Chronic illness, Death, Drug use, Gun violence, Infertility, Infidelity, Mental illness, Sexism, Sexual content, Slavery, Terminal illness, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Police brutality, Religious bigotry, Medical trauma, Murder, Colonisation, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism
Moderate: War
jazzy_cat's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Moderate: Death, Violence, and Murder
Minor: Abortion
franklloydweft's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
This was shaping up to be 5 star sci fi for me, until the ending. I understand that we have unreliable narrators here, and the point is to be uncertain about Decker and his state of mind,
Graphic: Death, Gore, and Gun violence
Moderate: Animal cruelty and Animal death
vk_fox15's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Dick is a fine author, I have nothing against him or his writing style. I was required to read this book for a class and have nothing against him personally. I initially went in with high expectations and for that reason I was unable to read through this book as I normally do with other books. To me it just felt dry.
I appreciated the world building and liked just how desperate the people of earth were. I praise Dick for his efforts in writing this novel, and can see why it has become such a highly praised literary classic amongst Western audiences, yet I just couldn't get through it.
The more I read the book the less I could picture myself within it, and for me, being able to immerse myself within the story is something I need to get through a book. Stories like 'Harry Potter' are heavily immersive, despite how unprofessional JK Rowling may be as a person, I could very well see myself within the dorm rooms of the Ravenclaw house (not to complement her).
'Do Androids...' isn't necessarily a "bad" book by any means, it just isn't immersive for me. There's something missing from it that I just can't put my finger on, and that's why I had to put the book down. To end this review, I would definitely recommend this book to anyone looking to get into the science-fiction genre, especially people who are into stories adjacent to 'The Hunger Games' concerning themes of government corruption.
Graphic: Ableism, Animal death, Death, Drug abuse, Emotional abuse, Gun violence, Xenophobia, Police brutality, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Abandonment, War, Classism, and Pandemic/Epidemic
mousecat's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Ableism, Animal cruelty, Death, Infidelity, and Murder
Moderate: Sexual content and Abortion
yennn's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
This book felt way ahead of its time and surprisingly much deeper than I thought it would be. I was sort of expecting more…robot bounty killing and action?
Anyways, almost immediately, I’m struggling to not associate this with franchises like Cyberpunk – I’ve never actually seen Blade Runner, so no issues there. There’s an almost comical contrast between the old and new technologies that was really interesting to read about. After a spout of info dumping about androids, I felt jump scared by the appearance of Kleenex. Truthfully, I had questions about the state of the Earth, but…you know when the answer is just ‘because sci-fi?’ The worldbuilding wasn’t too bad, but I wanted to know a little more about the off-world and android situation.
I greatly enjoyed the interactions with the androids and was having fun second guessing who was or wasn’t an android. But about half way through, where the other MC J. R. Isodore and ‘Mercisicm,’ (a religion? Cult?) intersected with bounty hunter Rick Deckard…. I started to lose interest. It ended up feeling like an ‘ersatz’ grand ending, but I felt so small reading this, whether because of the language barriers, or because of the pacing in the latter half I have no idea.
My very lukewarm review…. I neither disliked nor liked this. It was okay.
Moderate: Violence
Minor: Animal death, Death, and Infidelity
andrewkroninger's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Moderate: Death, Gun violence, Suicide, and Grief
Minor: Animal death