persychan's review against another edition

Go to review page

  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

2.5

Era un meh, di 3 stelle, con delle scelte di "dark fairytale" che mi hanno lasciato perplessa e mi hanno fatto chiedere quanta misoginia mai analizzata abbia l'autore, e quante fossero per l'amore dello shock, ma il momento in cui il libro stesso si sente in dover di dirti "Ah, questo libro parla di un bambino che diventa uomo" perchè non è in grado di comunicarlo in altra maniera, mi perdi.

"In quel momento divenne più uomo che ragazzo, e fu allora quando il suo passaggio all'età adulta ebbe seriamente inizio." a pagina 215.

Ah sì, il tipico passaggio all'età adulta: vedere corpi umani appesi come mosche a rovi giganteschi. Certamente si tratta di crescita, non di traumi che segneranno la tua intera vita e non ti permetteranno di diventare un adulto senza problemi di salute mentale. Di cui dimostravi già tratti, se non fosse che l'iniziale istinto di OCD viene eliminato dal "magari no" di un Boscaiolo/Figura paterna numero 2.

A parte i vari problemi del libro, ho avuto la sfortuna di leggerlo nella nuova edizione Fanucci che ha una terribile copertina AI (o come definita da amici, il primo caso di body horror con un libro), mentre la postfazione del libro mi tesse le lodi dell'edizione illustrata inglese. Così, per farti invidia che invece tu hai 'sta ciofecata.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

navyblu's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mockingjayx16's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

saskiajva's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

tigerhae's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional reflective tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

It had a slow start and was rather predictable at times, but flew much quicker once the real adventure started. I really enjoyed the way that the different classic fairytales were woven into his journey. However, there were a few things that I found immediate problems with while reading. 
My main issue was the portrayal of Roland’s sexuality. I do get how David’s initial about it being “unnatural” may fit into the WWII time period, but its use in the story still felt… off. Especially how Roland’s love for his “friend” is quickly used to insinuating that him being gay must that he must also harbor  inappropriate feelings for David, a literal CHILD! It all felt very unnecessary and made me pity Roland’s character in a way that I don’t feel was the author’s intention.
Another issue I found  was
David’s OCD just magically disappearing after one nice chat with the Woodsman. From the very beginning I thought that was such an interesting addition to his character, only for it to be quickly written away/cured once he entered Elsewhere! I just feel like it could have been included more throughout his journey.
I also found myself agreeing with other reviews about the randomness of the WWII setting or David’s fluctuating maturity level and how he oftentimes seemed unrealistic as a young boy, but I didn’t think about those things while I was actually reading, so much as after I finished and looked back. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

booksploration's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.5


The Book of Lost Things is a dark and twisted story about loss, grief, and growing up. Regardless of its playful cover and the age of the main character, it’s not a children’s book.

Here’s a short description (taken from another edition): "Taking refuge in fairy tales after the loss of his mother, twelve-year-old David finds himself violently propelled into an imaginary land in which the boundaries of fantasy and reality are disturbingly melded."

I find the premise of the book exciting, the cover is beautiful, the author’s love for books shines through the story, and he manages to convey the complex feelings of grief well. 
 
Despite all of this, I didn’t enjoy the book. "Disturbingly melded" summarises my overall impression (after reading the whole book) pretty accurately.

A few examples:

Blood and gore - I enjoy a good horror story and am not against scenes of graphic violence in general. However, I think the author sometimes overdid it a little in a way that didn't add to the story, especially since it’s about the adventures of a 12-year-old boy. 

Paedophilia and the way in which it is addressed - In other parts of the book, the author described scenes of violence VERY graphically, but on page 47, he used a horrible "euphemism" to talk about the heinous crimes of a child molester:
"Now, in another bedroom, he thought of Jonathan Tulvey and Anna, and wondered if a man from a clean little house, a man who lived with his mother and kept sweets in his pockets, had made them go down with him to the railway tracks. And there, in the darkness, he had played with them, in his way." I’m glad that Connolly didn't go into more detail here, but the choice of words ("played") seems VERY unfortunate.


Homophobia - I’m aware that David is "only" a child, but the same doesn’t hold true for the author who chose to write this:
"David was being dragged along on a quest for a man whom he had never met, a man for whom only Roland had feelings, and those feelings, if the Crooked Man was to be believed, were not natural. There were names for men like Roland where David came from. They were among the worst names that a man could be called. David had always been warned to keep away from such people, and now here he was keeping company with one of them in a strange land." (p. 237)


And there's so much to unpack here:
"A bedchamber contained a naked woman and a naked man, and the Crooked Man would bring children to them (not the special ones, the ones who gave him life, but the others, the ones he stole from villages or those who strayed from the path and became lost in the forest) and the man and the woman would whisper things to them in the darkness of their chamber, telling them things that children should not know, dark tales of what adults did together in the depths of the night while their sons and daughters were sleeping. In this way the children died inside. Forced into adulthood before they were ready, they had their innocence taken from them and their minds collapsed under the weight of poisonous thoughts. Some grew up to become evil men and women, and so the corruption was spread." (pp. 304-305)
 







Expand filter menu Content Warnings