Reviews

The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown

cbacon37's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous hopeful informative mysterious

4.25

johannej's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

reynate's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous informative tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

5.0

kleblanc's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Awesome book...can't put down, really thrilling

ninjakicknick's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark informative mysterious tense fast-paced

3.75

rymrgard's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Back when I first read Illuminati (= Angels and Demons) — being a young teenager, impressionable and very new in the field of what I considered to be „adult books“ — I thought of myself as a Dan Brown fan. A feeling very short lived, however, lasting for only two of his books (the aforementioned Illuminati and Meteor (Deception Point)), before I discovered that they are… well… not very good.
Still, disbelieving, I continued on. Read two more (Digital Fortress and Da Vinci Code) before I was forced to accept the facts. I never read more of him and never will.

Back then I had just heard of the famous CERN for the first time and desperately wanted to go there. I had a fable for renaissance art and everything concerning Da Vinci and Michelangelo I was bound to pick up and devour. Both Illuminati and Meteor hit the spot for me back then. I remember them more fondly than I‘m now convinced they deserve — hence the 3 star rating.
I have never reread them and never will. But I will also not lower my rating to what I would surely think of them now, maybe as a sign to myself that I take the judgements of my past self seriously, even if they were misguided.

If you find yourself enjoying these novels: That is absolutely fine. Different tastes for different people. I‘m sure there are books I love that you would never read voluntarily.

If you find yourself having liked them in the past, looking back now, questioning the sanity of your past self: That‘s absolutely fine too and nothing to be ashamed of. I also really liked Twilight once.

monetsmith8's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Controversial topic, I found this book quite interesting in terms of facts, the flow of the narrative and the interesting aspects of the cultural references and historical research.
Dan Brow does slip in some personal comments, criticism and opinions into the book, and so it cannot be taken at face value, whatever is said in the book.
I found it interesting since I have a love for history and cultures, and in that aspect it is quite nice. But you have to start this book with an open mind, otherwise your own views will clash with the book and you cannot enjoy the book as it should be enjoyed.

larrythelobster's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Just cuz it wasn't boring doesn't make this a well-written book. It was decent tho. Just a lil all over the place

henry535's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

pollydye's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious reflective tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0