belou's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional informative reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ales_99's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional inspiring reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

chloeereesss's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging emotional medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.25

Preferred the first book in series. But realy excited for the third. Some very challenging chapters and descriptions of events. LOVE the characters and relationships throughout the book

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

joypouros's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

5.0

This is the second of a trilogy. I had read the first two years ago, so I only vaguely remembered the characters. I think Follett does a good job jogging your memory about how you knew them before without too much exposition and without it being necessary to this book. 

This covers WW2 and follows many of the same characters and families as before. It does not focus very much on concentration camps, though it does not ignore them, but instead the every day family life of families in the USA, Germany, Britain, and the USSR. As such, families are divided on politics, men go to war willingly or otherwise, many people just try to survive. I liked that the focus was more broad, because there are a lot of books focused on the concentration camps. 

Maude, who moved from England to Germany after marrying a German in the first book, is there with her husband and two kids as the Nazis take power. Her husband dies for asking too many questions when their maid's handicapped child is killed. She and her daughter are against the Nazis, but her son joins them. 

In the USSR, an intelligence agent does his part for Stalin while fighting doubts about communism. 

An American daughter of a gangster cares more for her own social status than politics, but a loveless marriage and circumstances change her in many ways.

The stories are always so neatly entwined. 

It ends on the brink of the cold war, which is where the last book will pick up. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bambiann's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

asourceoffiction's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Like Fall of Giants, this is really several books at once; with separate but interconnected groups of characters spread across the UK, Germany, Russia and the US. The significance of history in this book is matched by that of the characters' more personal stories, and the balance between history and narrative is so brilliantly woven. In fact, it's the characters' individual stories that makes this so easy to read, despite its 900+ pages. The next generation from those we met in Fall of Giants takes up the narrative, but it's never unclear who anyone is thanks to Follett's gentle (but never patronising) reminders, and the cast list at the beginning of each book.

The Russian side of this story was particularly fascinating because I know so little about it, but it was incredibly disturbing to realise how much the Red Army abused their power as liberators of Germany. Assuming that the final part of the trilogy is about the Cold War, I'm intrigued to know more about this side of history.

While I love Follett's writing, this does suffer a little from a man-writing-female-characters perspective. That part of the book hasn't aged well and I did roll my eyes a few times at some of the assumptions made about women.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

beanjoles's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional informative sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

Winter of the World was a bit disappointing coming off of Fall of Giants.

Factually and historically, it's an informative and interesting book. I enjoyed learning about the lives of everyday people during this time period, particularly that of the German resistance. And I'm actually glad Follett didn't attempt to write heavily about or from the perspective of someone in a concentration camp — it would have been hard for him to do respectfully yet realistically.

That's actually my primary criticism of this book: lack of respectful and realistic representation. Having read the entire Kingsbridge series and now two of the Century of Giants trilogy,  I am simply BEGGING Ken to learn how to write a woman character. I cannot describe how irritated I was reading about Carla's experience
being raped by multiple Red Army soldiers at the end of the book. Did we NEED details about how they bit her nipples??? DID WE? And of COURSE she became pregnant, because Ken is allergic to just letting women exist without sexual harm coming to them. Look, I get it: women do face sexual violence all the time. But we don't need gory details to shock readers. Sometimes the way he describes these acts almost comes off like a kink to me and I don't like it. And to have her basically accept this child of rape and be "thankful" that she got a son out of the encounter... If I hadn't been listening to an audiobook, I would have slammed the book down and walked away for a few. 🥴
. That had me really fucked up and salty for basically the remainder of the book.

Ken's treatment of queer people is  better, although
we still lose Chuck partway through the story. I genuinely expected it would be Eddie, but I guess we got lucky enough to subvert that trope.
. I definitely laughed about
Chuck picking up Eddie when he's wounded and calling him "buddy." It was one of those small details that reminds you a heterosexual man is writing, lol.
I'm just plain thankful that we didn't have to watch
Robert von Ulrich get sent to a camp. It was brutal reading his partners death though.


I remain baffled that Ken has been married multiple times to women, because the sex scenes always feel so weird. This criticism applies for all his previous books that I've read, and I'm unsure how he's managed to never improve them over the years. I guess when the books sell, why bother. The descriptions of bodies and acts can feel a bit schoolboyish. Why do I need to know the size of each woman character's bush and breasts? The male characters never get this treatment. (Not that I want them to!) 

I think this all boils down to Ken's inherent difficulty relating with the female characters he writes. To his credit, he does try to have them engage with the feminism topics du jour, and sometimes he achieves meaningful commentary and true-to-life reactions. But (many) other times his writing resembles that tongue-in-cheek meme about Cassandra "breasting boobily to the stairs." It's a real weakness for all of his work, and Winter of the World represented a particular low for me. I get the impression that Ken thinks making a woman character smart and strong makes up for being unable to meaningfully write about their motivations and emotional landscapes. That approach rarely pays off, and despite their intricacy and historical value, his books are worse off for it. 

I'll continue on in the series  because for me, the historically-grounded and well-researched stories are still worthwhile. But I could really do without the sophomoric romances between shallow characters. Here's hoping the next one is less cringe in that department. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

morsa's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cathy_alice's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional informative inspiring sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

leahisdudish's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional informative tense medium-paced

3.0

t/w obvs because this is about war but the r**e scene really unsettled me.
also the way of writes about boobs gives me the ick. if you borrow my copy you will see REALLY KEN written next to every boob reference 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings