Scan barcode
peter_pjotter's review against another edition
4.0
Short and insightful. I needed a map to follow where eachr battle took place.
skinnylatte's review against another edition
3.0
Decent overview, pop history style. Good attempt to weave a good story around such a long period and so many disparate offshoots.
dutchlee's review against another edition
4.0
In this book, John Man tells the story of the Mongol Empire. It is a fascinating story about Gengis Khan, his empire, and what his descendants did with it. One of the most interesting aspects of the Mongol Empire was their internationalism - their acceptance and blending of people from all nations and beliefs, as long as they submitted to Mongol rule. This impacted the Mongol Empire in many ways both positive and negative.
There are a lot of details to get confused in, yet Man does a phenomenal job telling the story. I really liked his writing style, which made the history feel like a story. Man knows how to captivate his audience, when to skip over details, and when digressions are helpful or interesting.
Before I read this book, I knew very little about the Mongols, yet I found them fascinating. I wanted to learn more about them so when I came across this book at a bookstore I decided to buy it. I learned a lot about the Mongols. I also have forgotten much but it was well worth the read. I feel like I know much more about them and the golden years of their history. Now when I hear about Mongolia or about Chiness-Mongol relations, I will have a much better idea of what they are talking about.
There are a lot of details to get confused in, yet Man does a phenomenal job telling the story. I really liked his writing style, which made the history feel like a story. Man knows how to captivate his audience, when to skip over details, and when digressions are helpful or interesting.
Before I read this book, I knew very little about the Mongols, yet I found them fascinating. I wanted to learn more about them so when I came across this book at a bookstore I decided to buy it. I learned a lot about the Mongols. I also have forgotten much but it was well worth the read. I feel like I know much more about them and the golden years of their history. Now when I hear about Mongolia or about Chiness-Mongol relations, I will have a much better idea of what they are talking about.
pezski's review against another edition
4.0
Author John Man takes us from the youth of Temujin, and how he became Genghis Khan and built an empire that crossed Asia into Europe, to his descendants - not just Ogedai and Kublai, but all the branches of his family, taking us into the internecine feuds and jostling for power while the empire Genghis has founded doubled in size, and then caused it to fracture and split.
He does a wonderful job of following the often tortuous paths of history with clarity, but also setting them in the context and feel of time and place; the attitudes of the lands and nations who faced the Mongols, well-argued reasons for why they fell or resisted. The canvas is vast, and he introduced me to many aspects of this history of which I was entirely unaware: the facts that the Turks were a earlier wave of settlers from the same part of the world, the Mongol conquest of the entirety of Asian Islam, the fact that European Christian crusaders allied with the Mongols on more than one occasion ( from a belief that they represented the mythical Eastern Christian emperor Prester John to simple practicality of fighting the same opponent ), the failed invasions of Vietnam and Japan, the off-hand remark that modern Pakistan was part of the empire. Each of these and more could fill volumes in their own right, and I hope I can find accounts written as well as this.
Not that this book is simply a brief overview, Man goes into detail that is substantial and in depth, but not overwhelming. Early on I had been perhaps a little disparaging of his narrative style, but that was entirely unfair; while quite different from the style of, say, Tom Holland, one of my personal favourites and a consummate writer of narrative histories. While initially it seems that Man is rushing through events and piling up detail, he circles back and suddenly he is building a narrative picture that has drawn the reader right into the heart of the story. His main achievement, though, is the way he connects the events to modern history, not only the China ( including how the Chinese claim Genghis for their own ) but Russia, the 'Stans, the Middle East and even how it moulded medieval Japan.
I do have to say that one problem with the book is the way he deals - or doesn't deal - with rape. This becomes especially apparent in a later section when he revisits the fact that one of Genghis' sons was viewed ( possibly correctly ) as illegitimate as his mother had been held captive by an enemy tribe for several months, as well as the fact of Y-chromosomes originating in Mongolia being widespread throughout Asia and Europe. He states these matters as simply that, without acknowledging the sexual violence implicit in both. I'm sure the author would say something along the lines of "it was a simple fact of how the world was then", but he doesn't say anything in the text and this omission, whether he feels it irrelevant, or is uncomfortable with the subject, leaves for me a troublesome gap that should at least have been recognised.
He does a wonderful job of following the often tortuous paths of history with clarity, but also setting them in the context and feel of time and place; the attitudes of the lands and nations who faced the Mongols, well-argued reasons for why they fell or resisted. The canvas is vast, and he introduced me to many aspects of this history of which I was entirely unaware: the facts that the Turks were a earlier wave of settlers from the same part of the world, the Mongol conquest of the entirety of Asian Islam, the fact that European Christian crusaders allied with the Mongols on more than one occasion ( from a belief that they represented the mythical Eastern Christian emperor Prester John to simple practicality of fighting the same opponent ), the failed invasions of Vietnam and Japan, the off-hand remark that modern Pakistan was part of the empire. Each of these and more could fill volumes in their own right, and I hope I can find accounts written as well as this.
Not that this book is simply a brief overview, Man goes into detail that is substantial and in depth, but not overwhelming. Early on I had been perhaps a little disparaging of his narrative style, but that was entirely unfair; while quite different from the style of, say, Tom Holland, one of my personal favourites and a consummate writer of narrative histories. While initially it seems that Man is rushing through events and piling up detail, he circles back and suddenly he is building a narrative picture that has drawn the reader right into the heart of the story. His main achievement, though, is the way he connects the events to modern history, not only the China ( including how the Chinese claim Genghis for their own ) but Russia, the 'Stans, the Middle East and even how it moulded medieval Japan.
I do have to say that one problem with the book is the way he deals - or doesn't deal - with rape. This becomes especially apparent in a later section when he revisits the fact that one of Genghis' sons was viewed ( possibly correctly ) as illegitimate as his mother had been held captive by an enemy tribe for several months, as well as the fact of Y-chromosomes originating in Mongolia being widespread throughout Asia and Europe. He states these matters as simply that, without acknowledging the sexual violence implicit in both. I'm sure the author would say something along the lines of "it was a simple fact of how the world was then", but he doesn't say anything in the text and this omission, whether he feels it irrelevant, or is uncomfortable with the subject, leaves for me a troublesome gap that should at least have been recognised.
ejazhusseini's review against another edition
3.0
The story of Mongol Empire is the example of ‘one man and god (in this case the Heaven) being a majority’; the belief that the Heavens wanted Genghis to rule the world indeed made a majority which, almost, did rule the whole world. Kublai, though, deserves his own recognition in making this strong religious belief into a reality.
Full review:
https://hifzehayat.blogspot.com/2021/07/the-mongol-empire-review-when-you-only.html
Full review:
https://hifzehayat.blogspot.com/2021/07/the-mongol-empire-review-when-you-only.html