Scan barcode
hjb_128's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Child death, Infidelity, Sexual content, Antisemitism, Grief, and Alcohol
Moderate: Death
Minor: Racial slurs and Violence
qstew's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Infidelity, Misogyny, Sexism, Sexual content, Antisemitism, and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Alcoholism, Child death, Cursing, Death, Racial slurs, Racism, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Medical content, Grief, Death of parent, Alcohol, and Classism
Minor: Ableism, Eating disorder, Violence, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
seventhswan's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
On the whole I did genuinely enjoy this story and its characters, even if the vast majority of the wordplay, allusions, and references were lost on me. It was just about possible to parse out a narrative (with the help of Wikipedia!) and knowing in advance some basic Irish history and the general structure of the book did help me have a vague idea of what was going on. I would say that anyone with a decent grasp of English *can* read Ulysses - there are only very small sections in other languages or nonsense-speak - but there were certainly times where I was mechanically reading one word after the other just to get through it, and not properly digesting the meaning of what I was reading.
I've tried to organise my thoughts by section, as this is possibly the longest book I've ever read?
Telemachus: entirely understandable, gave me a false sense of security. Not dissimilar to the opening of any other well-written literary fiction.
Nestor: also fairly understandable, some weird sentiments about Jewish people that were uncomfortable to read.
Proteus: the point at which things first started to get difficult. I don't remember much about what happened but I remember being confused a lot. Think I got Wikipedia out at this point.
Calypso: a bit of a vibe shift but I enjoyed this section, other than the lengthy description of going to the toilet. There are women characters! And a coherent narrative again!
Lotus Eaters, Hades: both intriguing and really got into the descriptions of Dublin as a place. Despite not being entirely flattering, it made me want to go and see it for myself. Also mostly straightforward written English and interesting character backstories.
Aeolus: probably one of my favourite sections - different enough to be interesting without feeling like total nonsense.
Lestrygonians: more descriptions of Dublin as a living city! I liked this part! Also lots of food.
Scylla and Charybdis: not going to lie, I really struggled to follow this. I don't know enough about Shakespeare or his wife to understand it.
Wandering Rocks: not especially interesting to me, but understandable enough.
Sirens, Cyclops: struggled again with both of these, they were just extremely dense and yet somehow devoid of much happening that you could latch onto.
Nausicaa: *weird* in subject matter but I strangely enjoyed the way it was written? Perhaps I was just relieved to actually have characters and events I recognised again
Oxen of the Sun, Circe: the worst parts of the whole book to wade through in my opinion, I was just reading words to get closer to the end. I'm sure some very clever things were going on but they flew directly over my head
Eumaeus: back to prose I could actually read properly! Again, I enjoyed this section, but more from relief at understanding it than anything else.
Ithaca: I liked the question-and-answer layout of this section, less keen on more toilet talk and mathematics.
Penelope: 1000 pages in, we finally get to hear from Molly herself! Although written as extremely (think 20 pages each) long run-on sentences I found this not too bad to read and process, and the ending was satisfying. I don't think I could have dealt with a total non-ending after three months of reading.
Am I glad I read this book? I think I am! The parts that I was able to enjoy really were engaging, interesting, even funny in places. Would I recommend it? Only if you want to say you've read it - read Dubliners instead if you want stories set in Joyce's Ireland, and Didn't Nobody Give A Shit What Happened To Carlotta if you want chaotic travels across a city and that iconic ending line. Will I read it again? Honestly, probably yes, I think I could work a lot harder on understanding it - but not for several years, I'm back to strictly no-thoughts-head-empty reading for now.
Moderate: Death, Misogyny, Sexual content, Excrement, Antisemitism, and Alcohol
Minor: Pregnancy
timmytunter's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.25
That said, my overall experience with Ulysses was marked more by frustration than pleasure. I found the content at times painfully dull, and at other times simply nauseating, with a plot that I found ponderous, trite, and tedious. As a modern parallel to Homer’s The Odyssey, Ulysses strikes me as the very opposite of its grand and epic predecessor. While I understand that Joyce’s intent was to present a more mundane, perhaps even trivial, version of the hero’s journey, I found myself questioning the purpose of this choice. The Odyssey has its own flaws, but it is still a gloriously epic adventure, full of drama and heroism. In contrast, Ulysses often left me wondering, “To what end?” But then, I suppose, what is the point of any art. This is a line of thought I don’t care to pursue any further at present, for fear of meandering off the primary object of the present book review into Joycean tangents and digressions.
However, not all was lost in this literary labyrinth. There were episodes where I did derive some enjoyment, especially when I allowed myself to step back and view the text through a more abstract lens. By metaphorically crossing my mind’s eye(s), I was able to appreciate the bizarre and often surreal nature of some of Joyce’s episodes.
One of the highlights for me was Episode 14: Oxen of the Sun. This episode, with its chronologically successive prose styles, mirrors the evolution of English writing from Chaucer to the present day. Though relatively useless as a means of advancing the plot, it was, with the aid of guides and resources, an entertaining trip through the history of the English language. Joyce’s self-confidence is on full display here as he demonstrates his proficiency in almost any writing style.
Another episode that stood out was Episode 17: Ithaca. Some of Joyce’s most beautiful prose can be found within these pages. This catechismic episode also frequently amused me with its laughably overzealous attention to detail. The passage narrating the simple act of boiling water, for instance, stretches into an absurdly complex description, as if Joyce were daring the reader to endure the tedium of such minutiae:
“What concomitant phenomenon took place in the vessel of liquid by the agency of fire?
The phenomenon of ebullition. Fanned by a constant updraught of ventilation between the kitchen and the chimneyflue, ignition was communicated from the faggots of precombustible fuel to polyhedral masses of bituminous coal, containing in compressed mineral form the foliated fossilised decidua of primeval forests which had in turn derived their vegetative existence from the sun, primal source of heat (radiant), transmitted through omnipresent luminiferous diathermanous ether. Heat (convected), a mode of motion developed by such combustion, was constantly and increasingly conveyed from the source of calorification to the liquid contained in the vessel, being radiated through the uneven unpolished dark surface of the metal iron, in part reflected, in part absorbed, in part transmitted, gradually raising the temperature of the water from normal to boiling point, a rise in temperature expressible as the result of an expenditure of 72 thermal units needed to raise 1 pound of water from 50° to 212° Fahrenheit.
What announced the accomplishment of this rise in temperature?
A double falciform ejection of water vapour from under the kettlelid at both sides simultaneously.
For what personal purpose could Bloom have applied the water so boiled?
To shave himself.”
In short, by penning Ulysses, James Joyce doled out the ultimate literary troll to casual reader and scholar alike.
Ulysses was a challenging read, one that I am pleased to have completed, but equally pleased to not revisit. The pleasure I usually derive from reading fiction was largely absent, as my engagement with Ulysses became a mostly academic exercise. While this is not an exercise I dislike per se, I look forward to returning to the comfort of slightly more conventional works of fiction.
Graphic: Cursing, Infidelity, Misogyny, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexual content, and Antisemitism
Moderate: Alcoholism, Child death, Suicide, and Alcohol
marthadude's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Alcoholism, Child death, Cursing, Death, Infidelity, Misogyny, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexism, Sexual content, Toxic relationship, Xenophobia, Antisemitism, Grief, Death of parent, Cultural appropriation, Toxic friendship, Alcohol, Colonisation, and Classism
witherskeleton's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Infidelity, Sexual content, Xenophobia, and Antisemitism
Moderate: Cursing, Racial slurs, Medical content, and Alcohol
Minor: Police brutality
sunn_bleach's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
If someone wrote a comprehensive story about your particular existence, then there would be thousands of allusions that a reader wouldn't pick up on simply because the minutiae of everyday existence is filled with nuance and even encyclopedic level of experience. So, I'll recommend that you don't look up footnotes. Just read it. Experience what you experience. Then, whatever you walk away with from "Ulysses" (and other modernist literature) will be completely and uniquely yours as you bring your own allusions and experiences to the book.
That lesson is why this is one of the top five books I have ever read in my life - and that's not even getting into the prose, the deep satire, the idiosyncratic all-caps Dublin, the allegories... life also goes on.
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Alcoholism, Child death, Miscarriage, Violence, and Alcohol
Minor: Infidelity, Antisemitism, and Pregnancy
thanacestross's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Alcoholism, Antisemitism, and Alcohol
bookish_bry's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Most of this book is pointless, but that... sort of is the point. Joyce is taking a long epic of heroism and great feats like the Odyssey and comparing it to... some guy wandering around town and living his daily life.
It is definitely a great read, but not always and enjoyable one. I appreciate it and I might read it again someday, but for now I am happy just to be done.
I do suggest you read this if you are the type to challenge yourself, but know what you are getting into.
(Also Bloom please calm down on being horny for 5 seconds. This is all I ask.)
Graphic: Sexual content, Antisemitism, and Alcohol
Moderate: Child death
Minor: Ableism
Many of the main character(s) thoughts revolve around sex. There is some public masturbation (real) and some BDSM like scenes (imagined). These sex scenes have a narrative purpose, but are there.emmi_lee's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
Graphic: Cursing, Infidelity, Misogyny, Racial slurs, Sexism, Sexual content, and Alcohol
Moderate: Body shaming, Death, Racism, Antisemitism, Medical content, and Sexual harassment