taaya's review against another edition
2.0
Why is AOS so dystopian? It lacks most of what Trek had to offer that nothing else in the world had. The promise of a great (and mostly peaceful) world to live in (unless you go into uncharted territory, of course there’ll be dangers), lots of fun and lots of slow and philosophical adventures. I’m missing it.
This one was just about conspiracy (as in Section 31 and how they are still legal, WHY?!) and war. Nothing about interpersonal relationships, nothing about exploring new worlds, nothing about changing morals to include non-binaries, androids, ... Nothing about what Star Trek does best.
This one was just about conspiracy (as in Section 31 and how they are still legal, WHY?!) and war. Nothing about interpersonal relationships, nothing about exploring new worlds, nothing about changing morals to include non-binaries, androids, ... Nothing about what Star Trek does best.
hgeditor's review against another edition
3.0
Pretty boring this time, but it picked up toward the end.
birdmanseven's review against another edition
4.0
I liked that this was a complete story rather than a collection of mini episodes. It worked well.
kikiandarrowsfishshelf's review against another edition
4.0
Good solid story, tying nicely into previous issues and Star Trek Into Darkness.
esperata's review
2.0
This has the plot of a movie rather than an episode. It deals with the balance of power between the Federation, Klingons and the Romulans. Very dramatic and galaxy changing but a bit too large scale for my taste. It lacked the character interactions that made the original series so beloved.
And who agreed the cover art with NCC-1701-D printed on the Enterprise?
And who agreed the cover art with NCC-1701-D printed on the Enterprise?
More...