Reviews

The Meaning of It All: Thoughts of a Citizen-Scientist by Richard P. Feynman

exlibris007's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

3.0

kafiro_ka_kafka's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous hopeful informative inspiring lighthearted reflective fast-paced

4.5

My GOAT 

lorenzosivilotti's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

In spite of its grand title, rather trite and superficial, if with the occasional compelling argument—and a maddening habit of meandering into interesting questions, then just as quickly abandoning them. 5/10

kovyrin's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Started off great, but ended with an hour of rambling on irrelevant political matters of the days long gone. Still, some really great points on the scientific approach in different areas of our lives.

inesfefesfes's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative

3.5

selfoulger's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny hopeful inspiring reflective fast-paced

4.0

trin's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

A trio of lectures Feynman gave in 1963 on the theme of "A Scientist Looks at Society." He discusses politics, religion, and the role of science. Feynman's thoughts aren't always perfectly organized, but much of what he says—especially about how people aren't trained to think scientifically, and how that's a detriment to a society that's pretty much conditioned to perceive itself as incapable of understanding science and logical thought—is still remarkably relevant today. This seemed to me almost like a book of psalms for irreligious people; I found it very calming.

tyndareos's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Richard Feynman presents a concise lecture with his kind of presenting. 
He teaches how to improve reasoning and being more skeptic and think scientifically.
Sometimes it feels phrased a bit scattered, which could be good for beginners, but It's just a bit disruptive that he doesn't convey his points one by one. It reads itself more like a compilation of lectures than a book.
He says it's not a bad thing to be uncertain and is necessary in scientific reasoning. 

dukegiesbrecht's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective fast-paced

3.25

ez_heath's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective medium-paced

2.0