Reviews

Shriek: An Afterword by Jeff VanderMeer

depressed_frog_man's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative mysterious reflective slow-paced

2.5

not bad. just not for me

jmm3rs's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

sarvikaskas's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional funny mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

layres's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

sapphickohaku's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional funny inspiring mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

shyfroglet's review

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

emilycarney's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

another classic from our man Jeff here, no notes, deeply invested in this wack city of art movements and publishing house scandals and massive squid and underground mushroom people 🍄 

acrisalves's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

https://osrascunhos.com/2008/12/26/shriek-jeff-vandermeer/

«The fungus in this place has eaten into the typewriter ribbon. I’m typing in sticky green ink now, each word a mossy spackle against the keys. If I could turn off the light, no doubt my sentences would read themselves back to me in a phosphorescent fury-the indignation of creatures uncovered from beneath a rock.»

Ambergris, a cidade criada por Jeff Vandermeer, tinha-me já sido introduzida por City of Saints and Madmen: uma cidade assombrada pelos gray caps e habitada tanto por pessoas, como por fungos. Na verdade, a cidade comporta-se como se fosse propriedade passageira das pessoas: explosões de cogumelos, luminescências esverdeadas, nuvens de esporos e superfícies irregulares cobertas por mantas coloridas. Tais expressões de vida fazem lembrar os horrores escondidos na história da cidade, que ninguém pretende recordar.

Neste livro retorna-se a Ambergris, desta vez pela voz dos irmãos Shriek: Janice e Duncan. Ainda que a escrita principal pertença a Janice, vai sendo intercalada (entre parêntesis) pela de Duncan. A infância de ambos terá sido marcada pela morte do pai, um historiador que morreu de felicidade. Duncan, que cedo revelou vontade de explorar as florestas sombrias, os túneis escuros e outros lugares inóspitos; segue algumas das pegadas do progenitor, dedicando-se a tentar descobrir a verdade sobre os estranhos acontecimentos que assombraram a cidade de Ambergris. Janice, por sua vez, dedica-se às artes, recebendo alguma notoriedade por impulsionar um novo movimento artístico através do lançamento de Martin Lake.

A vida de Duncan será marcada por duas obsessões: a verdade sobre os graycaps e Mary Sabon; e ainda que tenha obtido algum sucesso pelos seus livros de história, cai no ridículo e no esquecimento quando revela factos que devem permanecer escondidos. Contaminado pelos fungos que habitam os subterrâneos que percorre, Duncan é, ainda, expulso do local onde lecciona por manter um relacionamento amoroso com uma das alunas – Mary. Também Janice cai no anonimato, recordando constante e melancolicamente os seus tempos áureos.

Uma história pausada e sofrida, Shriek possui um tom bastante diferente de City of Saints & Madmen, e talvez por isso não me tenha cativado à primeira. Tive que parar a leitura e só decorridos vários meses, retorná-la – desta vez engolindo as várias páginas de um trago. Por vezes, a leitura de um livro depende da nossa disposição, outras, só à segunda se entranha uma história. Ainda que algumas passagens sejam demasiado extensas, outras, como a da Ópera, ficar-me-ão na memória. Desta poderão ler um excerto no site do livro.

Nesse mesmo site, encontra-se informação sobre uma banda sonora e um filme, realizados em torno de Shriek.

Em português, de Jeff Vandermeer, foi publicado um pequeno livro contendo três histórias, pela editora Livros de Areia, A transformação de Martin Lake & Outras histórias, uma das quais (a que terá dado o título ao livro), terá vencido o World Fantasy Award.

drollgorg's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

I think I preferred City of Saints and Madmen for the diversity of its offerings and characters- the wide variety in perspective and skew of each story really creates a painting of this city as a whole. Shriek is focused on two character perspectives, one nested inside and commenting on the other, and while I found it very engrossing in the midst of reading, it ultimately couldn't surprise me as much as the first. I kind of like the textual effect of having one narrator commenting on the other's manuscript, but I feel like for the times that Duncan could complicate or challenge how the reader reads Janice's version of events, there were also times when his additions just sapped out suspense from the story or interrupted the flow without providing much. I found myself wondering why Vandermeer wasn't using footnotes- he already effectively demonstrated using footnotes to deliver two narratives in dialogue with each other in An Early History of Ambergris, and there it helped them stay more distinct from each other while still intertwined.

Still, I find his writing and imagery to be chilling or striking at moments, or deeply mysterious and alluring. I just got the sense of being shown and also repeatedly told about a huge, dangerous mystery that remains an open question mark at the end of the book. I'll finish the trilogy and see what I think then.

naked_lunch's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging emotional funny mysterious reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5