gladiolus17's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Foundryside’s characters are SO lovable and distinct. I thought this before for the City of Stairs, but Bennett really has a gift for dialogue and worldbuilding. Everything is so carefully crafted and well-thought over. The magic system—so unique and interesting.
75% in Sancia’s thoughts about herself hit me like a gut punch. And when she overcomes herself—!!!!!!
My only complaint is a minor one, but I still wish it wasn’t there. Foundryside is diverse and progressive in many ways, such as having LGBTQ characters and POC characters, but the casual fatphobia is still in it. The fat characters and fatness in general were depicted as greedy and evil, a common trope. There is one instance of gaining weight as a positive, where Gregor’s body size is commented on and he thinks (paraphrasing)
Spoiler
I gained weight because I was starving before in the war,Moderate: Sexual assault and Sexual harassment
Minor: War and Fatphobia
laguerrelewis's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Injury/injury detail, Sexual harassment, Blood, Body horror, Confinement, Gore, Grief, Alcohol, Slavery, Torture, Cursing, Fire/Fire injury, Medical trauma, Violence, Vomit, War, Police brutality, Sexual assault, Classism, Death, Medical content, and Sexual violence
Moderate: Cannibalism and Death of parent
amandabcook's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
Graphic: Violence, Medical trauma, and Slavery
Moderate: Blood, Gore, Injury/injury detail, and War
Minor: Sexual content, Classism, Fire/Fire injury, Murder, and Sexual violence
kell_xavi's review
2.5
Bennett’s basic world-building is kind of cool, though (and this may also be an element of the kind of book I’ve just described) perhaps not to the well-trained, in-depth fantasy reader. The idea that codes can train objects to act like other objects, essentially as though their reality is different and specific to another thing, is intriguing. The scrivers and fabricators, lexicons and Sancia’s powers are all fascinating. The problem is that a lot of the mythology is really complex, the advanced scrived designs get a bit out of hand, and Bennett ends up juggling a lot of stuff that, despite sometimes lengthy explanations, is often a mix of suspension of disbelief and deus ex machina. Which would be a good joke, considering how much of the story deals with gods, machines, advanced beings, magic cyborgs, and the like, except that the piling up of all these pieces sort of cracks the foundations that the story is built on. I was never sure, when the characters refer to god (as in, “god help me” etc.), which god they speak of, since there’s no religion mentioned and the distant past is legend. They also swear way too much, all said, so that it became a distraction and the characters blended together at times; and this alternate universe looks a lot like steampunk 19th century Italy.
Some of the reveals about the key, about Sancia, are moving, but there’s a way to write trauma without putting that trauma in the reader, and Bennett was not interested in doing so. There’s an abundance of scenes of torture, war, enslavement, of misogyny, of medical trials, of starvation and mutilation, a lot of which I didn’t feel served it’s purpose. It’s a terrible world that’s terrible to live in. Sancia is a scrappy thief with a weird curse, and one of the few people worth rooting for. Mostly, these circumstances made me less likely to read the rest of the trilogy.
Graphic: Torture, Slavery, War, Medical trauma, and Violence
Moderate: Excrement, Misogyny, Blood, Cannibalism, Murder, Body horror, and Colonisation
Minor: Vomit, Child abuse, and Physical abuse
randiriel's review against another edition
I wrote that much partway through reading. I've come to amend.
Spoiler
If you can use anything but rape, DON'T USE RAPE.Graphic: Medical trauma and Mental illness
Moderate: Slavery, Medical trauma, Trafficking, Suicide, Sexism, Murder, Mental illness, Violence, Torture, Sexual assault, War, Death, Kidnapping, Cursing, and Classism
Minor: Cannibalism, Vomit, and Racial slurs
rossandhissandwich's review
4.25
Graphic: Blood, Violence, Death, Torture, and Slavery
Moderate: Body horror, Gore, Vomit, Classism, and Car accident
Minor: Misogyny, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Terminal illness, Sexual assault, and War
spacecurl's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
It was a bit gruesome in parts which took me by surprise, but it matches the overall story and atmosphere of the book so it was tolerable to my soft heart haha
All in all I really enjoyed this book and will be reading the other two in the series in the future.
Graphic: Blood, Torture, Vomit, Violence, Slavery, and Body horror
Moderate: Death, Excrement, Gore, Murder, Car accident, and Classism
Minor: Terminal illness, Sexual harassment, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Misogyny, and War
kassidyreads's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Violence, Death, Blood, and Slavery
Moderate: Body horror, Gore, Misogyny, and Panic attacks/disorders
Minor: Cannibalism, Domestic abuse, War, Sexual assault, Confinement, and Torture
poetry_shaman's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Slavery, Violence, Blood, Colonisation, Death, and Excrement
Moderate: Death, Racial slurs, Sexual assault, and Torture
Minor: War
The G word is used to refer to a group of traveling people. While the occurrence of the word happens in dialogue and is not directed at a person or ethnic group, it does stand out and has aged poorly.jurizprudence's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
“Reality doesn’t matter. If you can change something’s mind enough, it’ll believe whatever reality you choose.”
so the merchant houses and their scrived tools' main thing is that they gaslight gatekeep girlboss their way into altering/manipulating objects and reality. that was interesting.
i think if you liked six of crows, you might enjoy this, though that was not the case for me so i really don't know lol
Graphic: Blood, Slavery, Violence, and Medical trauma
Moderate: Gore, Emotional abuse, Injury/injury detail, Torture, and Physical abuse
Minor: Body horror, Car accident, Confinement, Genocide, Sexism, Sexual content, and War