Reviews

Pan, by Sverre Lyngstad, Knut Hamsun

dagdraumar's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Pan er og forblir min favorittbok av Hamsun. Det er nesten 10 år siden jeg leste den sist, da likte jeg den godt, og etter å ha lest den igjen i år, er konklusjonen akkurat det samme. Nå har jeg riktig nok bare lest 2,5 bok av Hamsun, så sammenligningsgrunnlaget er kanskje ikke det største. Men sammenlignet med Sult og Markens grøde (som jeg bare klarte å lese halve av en gang på videregående), er Pan en bok det er litt mer liv i, på et vis. Den flyter noe lettere enn Sult, selv om jeg liker den også, og det jeg har lest av Markens grøde har ingen sjans. Nobelpris eller ei.

Løytnant Glahn, altså. En merkelig semi-eremitt som ikke helt forstår seg på menneskene rundt han. Forståelig nok. Det er en merkelig gjeng, med Edvarda i spissen som vingler mellom elskverdig og hatefull. Ikke rart man blir usikker og ikke ønsker videre kontakt med noen. Glahn er en litt fanden-i-voldsk mann som har noen impulshandlinger man kan le høyt av. Handlinger som selvfølgelig ikke passer så godt inn i datidens samfunn. Enkelte hendelser ville kanskje ikke passet seg så godt idag heller, for såvidt.

pavram's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Zbog novostečenog straha od debelih knjiga, došlo mi je da ugrabim sebi najbližu knjigu ispod dvesta stranica na polici i da je pročitam, kako bih istrebio ispite što su se zavukli ispod noktiju.
Najbliži je bio Pan, na sreću.

Samo ima kaže, jel, Pan je centralni motiv ovog izuzetnog romana (novele?). Bog prirode, družbenik nimfi deli mnogo više sa glavnim likom romana, Glanom, od proste zvučnosti imena. I jedan i drugi su okruženi devojkama, i jedan i drugi preferiraju samoću prirode od ljudi, i jedan i drugi su drugačiji od ostalih. Pan je faun, a Glan je čova što na skupove ide sa puškom pod rukom, pandan savremenom namrgodjenom tipu što ide na žurke i gleda koga će pre da bije, ledjima uvek naslonjenih o zid najbliži izlazu. Medjutim, Glan, za razliku od njegovog modernog duplikata, duboko je osećajna ličnost, pun tuge i željan ljubavi toliko da je rasipa na sve strane. I kako to obično biva, tragedija dodje u obliku fatalne, ali jedine prave devojke, u ovom slučaju ništa manje komplikovane Edvarde.

Hamsun je sjajan psiholog i njegovo nijansiranje likova je za naklon do poda. U Panu takodje, za razliku od jedinog drugog njegovog romana Glad koji sam čitao, ističe se njegov osećaj za lepotu i liričnost rečenice. Kako na pozadini romana izdavač (Lom, izdavač za primer) napominje, ovo je himna netaknutom severu i svoj divnoj lepoti koju on skriva. Glan, čini se, kao neko ko nije oduvek bio okružen tom divljinom, može da primeti svaki neophodni detalj koji drugima beži. I da mu se prepusti.

5

stinemarieerong's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

ademoraes's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I read this book some years ago, during the winter. Since the story is placed in Northern wilderness, most probably in Europe, I feel that I wouldn't have connected so strongly with the book had I read it in any other time of the year.

I liked this book better than "Hunger", in fact, maybe because there's more environment description and also because **Glahn is way less of a depressing character.** Yes, he is kind of exaggeratedly worried about what other people would consider normal affairs, much of it probably because he has little or no social skills (one more reason why I can relate), but at least he is still trying to get over his past bad life experiences with a bold, honest attitude. 

I find that Glahn's lack of social skills is what turned the book so enjoyable to read for me, since that due to this problem he is always theorizing about possible outcomes of certain social interactions, which leads to a strong analysis of human nature and hypocritical social rites. Also, the fact that he lives in a hut in the woods made the story even more attractive for me, since visiting Norway and those cozy huts has always been one of my dreams.

termith's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Я уже не помню, чем меня так зацепил Гамсун в детстве - читал я тогда только "Голод" - но впечатление осталось очень сильное.

То же самое случилось и с "Паном". Неторопливое повествование, очаровательные описания природы и страшные вещи, которые делает с людьми любовь. Иногда просто отрывался от книги и пытался понять, что только что произошло.
Страшная книга. Особенно, когда понимаешь, главного героя.

akemi_666's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Why is it that the self-obsessed person desires only possession of the other? Turned totally inwards, the whole world becomes their interiority, but an interiority that defies their desires. If they cannot dominate the world, they mutilate it, striking out at everyone through themselves, unto the dehumanisation of both self and other. It's pathetic.

Walden for emotionally-stunted teens trapped in adult-sized bodies.

katarinaroed's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective slow-paced

3.5

decadent_and_depraved's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

There is a love story here, but I much prefer to revel in the themes of alienation and estrangement. This work is also a great reminder of a strong connection that exists between solitude and nature.

shumska's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

hamsun je pisac po mom ukusu... svaki put kad ga krenem čitati, već nakon nekoliko rečenica u tijelo mi se useli mir. u vremenu u kojem živimo, u vremenu žurbe, napetosti, kratkih i brzih informacija - ili, čak, najšire gledajući: u vrijeme civilizacije - hamsun nudi život šuma, koliba, pašnjaka i livada. kod njega sve je živo: i kamen i planina i voda i oblak. vrijeme teče sporo, a ljudi su svedeni na svoje bazične emocije koje proživljavaju duboko, ali bez puno (nepotrebnih) riječi.

meni je to kao dom. kao povratak životu kakav bi mogao i trebao biti.

anxiouscowboy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5