Scan barcode
puffdiggity's review
3.5
3.5 Glad to have toured the subs in San Diego - helped a chunk with making this book scarier while reading, I think. I loved the slow burn of the vamps and the sub atmosphere. For a short novel, all the characters were fleshed out enough for me, and I felt connected to them. The bad - the Soviet threat was sooo back burner it almost felt silly to include it. I also wish we got a taste of what the green eyed woman wants. It's clear they are smart and using a strategy, but why? If they didn't have a "leader" and human accomplices, it almost would have been better. Or flesh that out just a teensy bit for us. Regardless, it was a fun read that I enjoyed the audio for a lot.
erindennis's review against another edition
5.0
This was such a fun and entertaining read! Great option for horror fans.
emoo_emuu's review against another edition
medium-paced
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
emsmeat's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
mysterious
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
This book is what I would call "dad lit fic". A serious naval military thriller-esque story with the added benefit of vampires. As a concept, I think the idea of writing "what if there was a vampire on a submarine" seriously is extremely funny. In reality, I found the execution very underwhelming. I cannot remember a single characters name or differentiating characteristics. I can only recall "guy who transferred ships" as having any kind of backstory. At least one man was Black, and I can't tell you if it's the same man. The Cajun cooks were cute though. I'm not sure, I think I wanted this to be so over the top that the book was funny, and while the concept really is, I wanted it to be goofier. I didn't find it scary. I did learn about submarines. I did think I could survive if on that sub. While this might be influenced by what's going on in my life and brain right now, this was so meh to me. 3.0
kmbookshelf's review against another edition
4.0
I don't usually like vampires, but I really enjoyed this one. Specifically because the setting of a naval submarine is so interesting! This was a gripping little page turner!
mr_houses's review against another edition
4.0
¿Vampiros en un submarino nuclear en misión secreta? ¿La caza del Octubre Rojo con chupasangres? Póngame más.
Es una novela de concepto pero esta bien completada. Va cogiendo ritmo lentamente para culminar en un Salem's Lot desbocado en el único lugar donde es imposible que de la luz del sol, un submarino en territorio enemigo. Engancha y mantiene un nivel muy correcto. Tampoco se pide más y le añado una estrella porque me atrapó completamente y me robó horas de sueño.
Es una novela de concepto pero esta bien completada. Va cogiendo ritmo lentamente para culminar en un Salem's Lot desbocado en el único lugar donde es imposible que de la luz del sol, un submarino en territorio enemigo. Engancha y mantiene un nivel muy correcto. Tampoco se pide más y le añado una estrella porque me atrapó completamente y me robó horas de sueño.
natbookreviews's review
2.0
Review of “100 Fathoms Below”
How I read: 🎧
⭐⭐☆☆☆ - (Rating System Below)
”100 Fathoms Below” was definitely an experience, but not one I’d rush to repeat. The premise—a Cold War submarine mission turned supernatural horror—sounded intriguing, and my reading group had joked about it before we found it free on Audible. While it wasn’t a total waste of time, the story’s disjointed writing and uncomfortable prologue set a rocky tone that never fully recovered, even as the tension picked up aboard the USS Roanoke.
The middle portion of the audiobook had some gripping moments as the crew faced both external threats and internal chaos. The mix of Cold War intrigue and horror elements didn’t always mesh well, leaving parts of the story feeling forced or awkward. The narration was solid, but even a good performance couldn’t save the disjointed storytelling.
The ending was where things truly went off the rails. While I am glad I finished it for the joke of it all, the final scenes felt unnecessary and left me with an unpleasant aftertaste. I wouldn’t recommend this book unless you’re really curious or, like me, need to satisfy a long-running joke. It’s a short listen, but not one I’ll revisit or easily recommend to others.
Get it at…
📗 - Hard Copy -📗
📱 - Digital - 📱
🎧 - Audio - 🎧
Libro.FM - (Not Available at Time of Review)
___________________
*Star Rating Guide*
⭐ - The writing style didn’t appeal to me. The characters didn’t resonate with me. I pushed myself to the limit to avoid DNF’ing. I wouldn’t suggest this book to anyone I’m acquainted with.
⭐⭐ - The book was passable, but it won’t stick in my mind. Although I didn’t abandon the book, my mind wasn’t fully immersed in the story. I discovered that it was easy for me to stop reading it and not feel compelled to continue promptly. When everything was said and done, I was unsure of my immediate opinion on this book.
⭐⭐⭐ - If someone is actively seeking a book in this general premise, I would suggest this. While it was good, I don’t think I’ll ever pick up this book for a second read. If it were part of a series, I’d probably venture into the next book. Reading it was time well-spent.
⭐⭐⭐⭐ - This book was brilliant. I had the urge to keep reading and turn to the next page. The book stayed on my mind for days after I finished it. I highly recommend this book to everyone.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ - I was actively engaged in wanting to finish reading this book. My thoughts are consumed by this book after completing it. I want to have a physical copy as a trophy that I can display on my shelf. I felt a strong connection and investment while reading this book, would definitely recommend.
galaxywitch's review
dark
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.0