Reviews

Katherine by Anya Seton

hoopoebird's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional hopeful informative inspiring mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

thayawar's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Oh myyyy this book!! I was addicted, Katherine too had me bewitched! Uhhhh this gave me insane amounts of emotional turmoil, all the feels. Loved this even more than Dragonwyck!!

jthunderrr's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Totally understand why folks fawn over this novel. It’s expansive, covering 30+ years and flawlessly sets the story among real historical events. Seton’s writing is strong and consistent, the pacing is great, and she makes the storytelling seem effortless. Katherine as a character is believable and has depth as she wrestles with questions of spirituality, class, loyalty, family, and of course, love. Floored by the deep level of historical research Seton had to do for this book before Wikipedia existed. The depiction of the relationship dynamics between John and Katherine may lose some luster for modern audiences (John was kind of a jerk IMO), but knowing that Seton wrote this in the 1950s helps.

Why hasn’t this been made into a series yet a la Outlander? Also, is there a biography of Seton’s life because she seems fascinating.

cdel1313's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This book has been one of my first travels into medieval England before the Tudor era. I loved reading the story of Katherine and John, and connecting pieces of history - family trees, and even some of the rebels whose names I have come across in other stories. I definitely have to check into more of Anya Seton's books.

longtimewish's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Este libro me arruinó la vida.

Katherine es un clásico de la ficción histórica (o al menos eso tengo entendido), un género que me interesa mucho últimamente. Ya sabía algo de este período histórico, y del destino de varios personajes que dan vueltas por estas páginas. Así que creí que estaba preparada para lo que fuera que me diera esta novela. Estaba equivocada.

Esta es una historia de amor que transcurre durante años en medio de tramas políticas, guerras, plagas y muerte. Sin embargo, para ser una novela romántica, la pareja principal pasa la mayor parte del tiempo separada. Esto también ya lo sabía, gracias a reseñas que leí con anterioridad. Lo que no sabía es lo mucho que me iban a doler estas separaciones.

Casi sin darme cuenta, esta novela empezó a causarme una angustia en el pecho, un anhelo incesante, como si hubiera algo que deseara , casi al alcance de mis manos, y no lo pudiera tener por mucho que intentara. Casi sin darme cuenta, el anhelo y dolor de Katherine y John se volvieron míos.

Si tuviera que describir Katherine con una sola palabra sería esa: anhelo. Anhelo por un amor imposible, por un destino impensable. Anhelo constante cada vez que nuestros protagonistas no podían, no debían, o no querían estar juntos, pero aún así lo deseaban. Deseo y anhelo, dos emociones constantes en esta historia, casi indistinguibles, porque incluso cuando están juntos hay algo que hace que esa sensación persista en todo momento.

Aunque no hay solo anhelo y deseo, este libro está cargado de tristeza y felicidad, de ira y paz, de resentimiento y perdón, de insatisfacción y - recién en las últimas páginas - satisfacción. Hace mucho que un libro no me transmitía tantas emociones. De hecho, casi en la última parte, cuando la rueda de la fortuna de uno de sus últimos giros y dicho llanamente, se va todo a la mierda, la situación me causó tanta angustia y tristeza que tuve que parar de leer, hacer la gran Joey y poner el libro "en el freezer" por unos días.

Y es que este maldito libro está tan bien escrito que conectas con la historia de una manera impresionante. No solo por la manera en que las emociones de los personajes están plasmadas, sino también por las descripciones: podía visualizar claramente el mundo de Katherine, la Inglaterra y Europa medieval. Hay un gran trabajo de investigación, y se nota. A veces tal vez demasiado, tantos nombres y menciones a conflictos socio-políticos creo pueden resultar un poco abrumadores, pero nunca me perdí. Porque la autora nunca se pierde: sí, el contexto es importante (y supongo que sí yo también hubiera investigado tanto - Seton fue hasta Inglaterra y visitó las locaciones reales en las que Katherine vivió - habría tratado de demostrarlo de sobra en mi novela), pero nunca olvidamos cuál es la historia que estamos siguiendo: la de Katherine Swynford.

Dicho todo esto, esta novela no es, ni por cerca, perfecta. Al contrario, hubo varias cosas que no me gustaron (el día en que la relea hay una parte que directamente voy a saltear), pero por primera vez no considero que sean motivo para bajarle la puntuación (aunque lo pensé). Porque siento que todo lo bueno supera con creces lo malo, y porque hasta el disgusto que lo último me causó fue resultado directo de lo bien que está hecha la historia.

Escrita en los 50, creo que dentro de todo (y sobre todo teniendo en cuenta que está ambientada en el siglo XIV) envejeció bien. Aunque una de mis mayores críticas, que entra dentro del paraguas de "varias cosas que no me gustaron" es que hay algunas situaciones que si bien tienen perfecto sentido en el contexto histórico de Katherine, no pude evitar sentir que en realidad eran la moral e ideología de los 50 disfrazadas de la moral e ideología del 1300. Pero aún así, mantengo mis palabras (en especial viendo como hay libros de menos de diez años que envejecieron horriblemente, por no decir otra cosa).

Una lectura que me rompió el corazón en pedazos, para luego enmendarlo, para romperlo de nuevo, así en sucesión hasta el final. Inesperadamente, Katherine se convirtió (hasta ahora) en mi lectura favorita del año. Y en una de mis lecturas favoritas en general. Casi tan inesperadamente como la propia Katherine se convirtió, contra todo y sin saberlo, en una de las mujeres más importantes de la historia de Inglaterra.


PD: Si bien hay un gran trabajo de investigación y queda plasmado, no sé tanto sobre Katherine Swynford y John of Gaunt para decir qué tan históricamente correcta es esta novela, pero por lo que leí, dentro de lo sabido se apega a los hechos.

PD 2: Había un montón de nenes en esta historia, estaba preocupada todo el tiempo de que en cualquier momento palmaran porque era el 1300, no existían las vacunas ni la penicilina, y solo sabía con certeza que dos sobrevivían la infancia, el resto no tenía ni idea
SpoilerSOBREVIVEN TODOS altos genes Katrine
.

frankchester's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

gemmawithag's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

berenikeasteria's review against another edition

Go to review page


I persisted with this book for as long as I did because it is so overwhelming rated highly and described as a “classic” of historical fiction. But I’m very much afraid I have to pull a DNF on this one. I just can’t stand to read any more of this novel. I’ll try and explain the good and the bad below, and why this book just didn’t work for me.

The Good:

Anya Seton has really done her research trying to get the historical setting as detailed and accurate as she can. The ins and outs of daily life in the late 14th century, the objects, attire, and the importance of religion and piety in peoples’ lives are all meticulously detailed and expanded upon. I appreciate the intention here, even if it didn’t quite come off – I’ll explain in a moment. I think it’s great that Seton wanted to create and authentic environment for her story, and it is obvious she put time and effort into that.

I’m genuinely wracking my brains for something else to put in this section. Um… it wasn’t as bad as the likes of Philippa Gregory, Jean Auel, Michelle Moran, et. al.? The characters aren’t butchered and Seton’s writing style is basically competent. I got nothing…

The Bad:

Seton takes her research too far. She describes the setting in too much detail, spending too much time describing minute details that are irrelevant to the story, and it gets to the point where it becomes too much. Cut this stuff out and the novel would be a lot more succinct and to the point. As it is it rather meanders.

Seton describes the window-dressing in too much detail but doesn’t describe the historical context in enough detail. Relevant events in the lives of the main characters, political upheaval, they’re just glossed over and not properly explained. Katherine, we’re told, takes no interest in political matters. She exists in a bubble of love and domestic bliss with John of Gaunt and doesn’t question what goes on outside that bubble. When John’s father is ailing and the heir to the throne is still a child, John takes an ever greater role in government, and faces opposition which keeps him occupied and stressed. Katherine sees this merely in terms of “he doesn’t love me any more because we don’t spend as much time together!”, whilst, when we do get inside John’s head, his hardline tactics with the populace are explained as “there was this boy once who told me I was a changeling and I must prove myself to everyone!” Really?! Serious matters of the time – with, undoubtedly, potential for epic drama in a novel – reduced to a grown man nursing a boo-boo and a woman whose life revolves around his love and attention? Urgh. I guess this is where the book is more of a romance novel than a historical fiction, but really I was expecting better.

Pseudo-medieval dialogue. The text is peppered with the likes of “Nay, sweeting” and “Ay, lovedy” and “What ho, my lord”. This doesn’t feel medieval, it feels like the 1950s trying way too hard to masquerade as medieval. It’s painful.

Flat characters. Minor characters often just walk on-stage and walk right off again without making an impact or serving merely as a deus ex machina to move things along. They’re stock characters – the prudent sister, the stubborn-yet-cheerful peasant serving woman, the protective puppy-dog squire, the grasping king’s mistress. John and Katherine are worse cases though. They just don’t feel like real people. I couldn’t see why these two characters fell in love at all. They think each other is good looking, and that seems to be pretty much it. That could work as a Katherine Swynford/John of Gaunt story, I think – two people falling into bed with each other, and slowly over time something more growing of it. But Seton seems to imply that this is an Epic Romance, and that just because they lust for each others’ bodies there’s some kind of Deep Connection going on, when there’s actually nothing to warrant it. Like any cheesy romance, John of Gaunt’s childhood boo-boo puts him into Punish Everyone mode, which creates a Big Misunderstanding and leads Katherine to think he doesn’t love her anymore. And, like any cheesy romance heroine, Katherine decides she’s going to Leave Unexpectedly Without Talking To Him. Did I mention how much I hate it when romance novels create false tension between their romantic leads by creating Big Misunderstandings that could be easily resolved if said characters would only talk to each other for ten minutes? It’s so dull being inside Katherine’s head too. Her thoughts consist of inconsequential observational narrative, and the Epic Love that she shares with John. She doesn’t seem to have a life outside of him. She has children and yet she hardly thinks about them, even when said children clearly express unhappiness with the current situation to her. We’re told she has no interest whatsoever in politics, and nothing else is shown as a topic or pastime she’s passionate about. Katherine also suffers from Purity Sue syndrome. She nurses John’s virtuous first wife in her final hours because she’s Just That Good. She’s beautiful, naïve, men fight over her, and she remains a passive inspiration to others, lacking in agency and interests outside of the romance. John’s groping her whilst still in mourning for his dead wife, and we’re often told that Dead Wife Would Have Wanted It This Way. Meanwhile, wife number two is Foaming At The Mouth Obsessed With Conquering Her Birthright and uninterested in John, other than in his capacity to achieve said Conquering and sire an heir for her. This is probably the biggest problem with the entire book. These people just don’t feel like complex human beings, they feel like awkward unsympathetic caricatures.

Too much preamble. The main plot of this novel is supposed to be the relationship between John of Gaunt and Katherine Swynford, right? So why does it take over 250 pages to get there?! I understand a certain amount of setting up – Seton wants to tell a little bit about Katherine’s origins, and how she was married and had children before she became John’s mistress and had children with him – but 50 or 100 pages surely ought to be the limit. It dragged far too much and the more so for knowing that as readers we’re waiting for the inevitable to happen.

I know my opinion is in the minority here, but I’ve had enough.

3 out of 10

wimzie's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional informative reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

kerrykerryboberry's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

Very slow, heavy use of archaic language. It took me 80% of the book to be even slightly invested.